-
Those who dared:
Kayla on tasting ‘a note in the… Marcus Roche on maybe it’s me, but… ouaqquwcgk on my confession dkmhwgijnw on random awesomeness Kris on maybe it’s me, but… -
Recent Posts

news just in…
… popular m/m romance author M L Rhodes has recently announced that the third book in her Draegan Lords series, Fires of Ballian, is to be released by September 30.
This exciting news was first learned right here on this very blog!
Hardly any begging or other shameless behaviour was carried out in order to con persuade the author to put Wave and I out of our misery to let her fans know when the next in the series could be expected.
That September 30 happens to be this blogger’s birthday and it will make a terrific present is pure coincidence.
Posted in Jessewave, M L Rhodes, me
7 Comments
hypothetically…
Riddle me this, virtual folk.
Say someone had this many books in their tbr pile
+ 8 books to review for another blog
+ looming deadlines associated with the evil day job
+ lack of motivation due to sheer boredom and a crappy week.
Would you, hypothetically speaking, say it was fucking stupid obsessive bordering on manic idiotic to the extreme not in the best interests of a bit silly for said person to order more novels from the tame romance bookstore???
Let me know when you come up with the right answer.
Posted in evil day job, Jessewave, randomness, tbr books, WTF
18 Comments
life’s too short
I know I blather on about things I see and read that resonate with me, but I think this is one of the greatest things I love about fiction; when a story or a character or a setting or a scene or a conversation or even a one-line remark touches you in some way.
It can be something hugely powerful which feels like you’ve been gripped by the throat and you can’t shake it off. Or it can be a warm feeling that wraps around you, makes you feel comfortable and brings a smile to your face.
This leads me to one of my recent reads, which was the latest book in Jayne Ann Krentz’s Arcane Society series. This author is a favourite of mine because of the fabulous dynamic between her heroes and heroines and the masterly (or is that mistressly??) way she crafts a conversation.
In Running Hot, the main protags have a discussion about a romantic suspense novel the heroine is reading. It was the latter part of this that I can’t stop thinking about. Here it is:
“If I want real police work I’ll read newspapers, not a book,” she said.
“Probably a good idea. Let me know how that one ends.”
She turned another page. “I already know how it ends.”
“You read the ending first?”
“I always read the ending before I commit to the whole book.”
He looked at her, baffled. “If you know how it ends, why read the book?”
“I don’t read for the ending. I read for the story.” She looked toward the entrance, watching a cab that had pulled up in front. “Life is too short to waste time on books that end badly.”
“By badly you mean unhappily, right?”
“As far as I’m concerned the two are synonymous.”
The heroine’s logic, convoluted though it might be for some, works for me.
The main reason I read the huge, swirling mass of sub-genres making up romance fiction is because I want a story that progresses, through conflict and challenges, character development, whatever, towards a ‘good’ ending. I’m usually guaranteed this precisely because the book IS a romance.
This doesn’t mean all threads need be wrapped up in a neat and tidy bow, or it can’t be HFN, or it must have a white wedding or commitment ceremony, or finding out how many children the couple have, or knowing they live to a ripe old age before dying a few weeks apart.
It means by the last page of the book that I, as a reader, need to be convinced the relationship between the protags is going to work (in some way, shape or form).
I want to be satisfied and, yes dammit, I want my happy ending!
So how about you? Is “Life is too short to waste time on books that end badly”? Because I’m seriously wondering whether I should steal borrow this as a motto for my blog. *g*
Posted in hea, hfn, jayne ann krentz, randomness
19 Comments
tasting my keepers: the psycop series
The PsyCop series by Jordan Castillo Price
The Blurb of the First Book, Among the Living:
Victor Bayne, the psychic half a PsyCop team, is a gay medium who’s more concerned with flying under the radar than in making waves.
He hooks up with handsome Jacob Marks, a non-psychic (or “Stiff”) from an adjacent precinct at his ex-partner’s retirement party and it seems like his dubious luck has taken a turn for the better. But then a serial killer surfaces who can change his appearance to match any witness’ idea of the world’s hottest guy.
Solving murders is a snap when you can ask the victims whodunit, but this killer’s not leaving any spirits behind.
Why I bought it:
The blurb totally hooked me. Totally.
Dislike/like (ending on a high note):
Dislike~ ….
….
….
….
…. I’m thinking alright!
Like~ I love Victor. He is a flawed character, barely hanging in by a thread, yet he manages to stumble his way through cases, nab the bad guy and find a hottie. You gotta love that. His SO and the cast of secondary characters are all pretty awesome too. Good characters = much joy for Kris. *g*
Dislike~ Probably the only thing that makes me a bit squicky is that Jacob gets off on Victor’s abilities and experiences. It’s pretty easy to shrug off though if you think of it as a (granted, a very odd) kink and, hey, if it doesn’t bother Victor… 🙂
Like~ Just when you think you’ve figured out the crime/mystery side of things along comes a twist. I love the way this author’s mind works. She has plots, sub-plots, threads and undercurrents throughout her stories and pulls them all off to much satisfaction. That, my friends, takes skill and talent.
So, what I think:
This series is in my keeper collection. I love it. I’ve just finished the latest book, Camp Hell, and already I want more.
====================================
‘Tasting’ is my version of a mini-review where I talk a (very) little about what I liked and disliked about a book as well as who I think the story will appeal to. Oh, and I’ve added a bit about why I picked up the book in the first place – sometimes this can be interesting to know.
Posted in jordan castillo price, m/m, tasting my keepers, urban fantasy
10 Comments
another post already??
Who can possibly resist the gorgeous eyes on this cover??
I swear I keep on hitting Wave’s blog just to look at him so I thought I’d bring him a little bit closer to home. *g*
Oh yeah. Wave also reviewed the book and it sounds like a fun, fantasy read.
Tempted to say who cares cos honestly…
… well, look at him!
Posted in book covers, Jessewave, Luisa Prieto, reviews-not mine
14 Comments
tasting ‘wages of sin’
It occurred to me the other day that I haven’t really talked about any of the books I’ve read which I either didn’t enjoy so much or were a DNF.
To be frank, I’m just not interested in getting too bogged down in reviewing and rating books on my own blog, especially the ones that may have been so-so. I know myself well enough to realise I could easily slide down the path of other well known review sites I refuse to visit by becoming insulting, obnoxious and pretentious under the veneer of so-called humour.
That being said, I also want to be honest (to others and to myself) and talk about why some books hit or missed with me. It’s not something I intend to do very often, but I think my ‘tasting’ format will let me do this and still give you all enough information to make a decision about whether or not you want to try the story for yourselves.
After all, we all have different tastes and something that didn’t hit my reader’s buttons could easily intrigue yours. 🙂
So, here goes and please let me know what you think…
Wages of Sin by Jenna MacLaine
The Blurb:
Dulcinea Craven descends from a long line of witches, and she has just inherited wild, untrained magical powers that she has no idea how to control. Now a ruthless vampire and an age-old demon are determined to enslave Cin and steal her power for their own. Her only hope is The Righteous, a band of warrior vampires who slay the rogue undead. Among them is Michael, a fierce swordsman who inflames Cin’s most primal hungers. Showing her a sensual pleasure beyond anything in the mortal realm, she must choose between the human existence she has always known, and immortality as a vampire—a new life filled with forbidden urges, dark yearning, and unearthly passions…
Why I bought it:
Dulcinea Craven descends from a long line of witches, and she has just inherited wild, untrained magical powers that she has no idea how to control. Now a ruthless vampire and an age-old demon are determined to enslave Cin and steal her power for their own. Her only hope is The Righteous, a band of warrior vampires who slay the rogue undead. Among them is Michael, a fierce swordsman who inflames Cin’s most primal hungers. Showing her a sensual pleasure beyond anything in the mortal realm, she must choose between the human existence she has always known, and immortality as a vampire—a new life filled with forbidden urges, dark yearning, and unearthly passions…
Why I bought it:
I’m always on the lookout for new authors to read and this looked interesting.
Dislike/like (ending on a high note):
Dislike~ I read the blurb and expected urban fantasy. As soon as I started reading the story I realised it was historical. Those of you who’ve become familiar with my tastes realise I’m not a huge fan of historical fiction. I have to be seriously in the mood for it and even then I have my authors who I prefer to read. I felt blindsided and unfortunately because of this couldn’t get into the story.
Like~ The author’s writing style is very readable/ accessible/ whatever… you get the point!
Dislike~ I kept reading and thinking to myself when are they going to start calling her ‘Cin’?? I know; it’s such an utterly ridiculous thing to get stuck on! I also vaguely wondered why they would call her that because she seemed pretty righteous to me. *shrugs* No doubt I would have found out later in the book.
Like~ I liked the secondary characters. In fact, I liked them even more than I did the main characters, who I couldn’t really connect with. I particularly enjoyed the housekeeper (mother) and companion (daughter) to the female protag and their relationship with her.
So, what I think:
Although this was a DNF for me, I think it will appeal to those interested in an historic spin on the urban fantasy/paranormal romance genre.
==========================================
‘Tasting’ is my version of a mini-review where I talk a (very) little about what I liked and disliked about a book as well as who I think the story will appeal to. Oh, and I’ve added a bit about why I picked up the book in the first place – sometimes this can be interesting to know.
Posted in dnf, jenna maclaine, m/f, tasting
4 Comments
being an irreverent mumma
I saw this great Q & A thing for parents and kids at Tracy’s blog (whose girls are such cuties 🙂 ) so I thought why not try it with my boys.
Here’s how it went…
1. What is something your mum always says to you?
Feliks: Bad Cat!
Boris: No, kitty, no.
Feliks: When I accidentally pat her with my claws out.
Boris: When I play with her toes when she’s asleep. It scares her, I think. 4. How does your mum make you laugh?
Feliks: When she thinks she can get us to stop fighting.
Boris: Yeah. She makes funny noises.
Feliks: Bad Cat!
Boris: No, kitty, no.
2. What makes your mum happy?
Feliks: When she feeds us, pats us and we lay on her and stuff.
Boris: When we’re not naughty.
Feliks: When I accidentally pat her with my claws out.
Boris: When I play with her toes when she’s asleep. It scares her, I think. 4. How does your mum make you laugh?
Feliks: When she thinks she can get us to stop fighting.
Boris: Yeah. She makes funny noises.
5. What was your mum like as a child?
Feliks: Small like us but not as furry.
Boris: *nodding*
6. How old is your mum?
Feliks: In cat years?? Nearly 5.
Boris: Ancient. That’s how old she says we make her feel.
7. How tall is your mum?
Feliks: High enough to be a great perch.
Boris: *whispers* She’s a giant.
8. What is her favourite thing to do?
Feliks: Pat us.
Boris: Feed us.
9. What does your mum do when you’re not around?
Feliks & Boris: ????????????????
10. If your mum becomes famous, what will it be for?
Boris to Feliks: What does that mean? Is she leaving us because she’s become famous??
Feliks: *sigh* It’s a hypothetical question, doofus.
Boris: Oh… What does that mean?
Feliks: *rolls eyes* Just forget it. It’s not like she can become famous for looking after us anyway.
11. What is your mum really good at?
Feliks: Cleaning up after us.
Boris: Saying bad words. *giggle*
12. What is your mum not very good at?
Feliks: Not saying bad words.
Boris: Letting us play with the stuff we want to play with. You know like those white things that come in the little boxes with plastic on them. Man, they’re fun on the floor boards.
13. What does your mum do for her job?
Feliks: She reads a lot and plays with that long black thing she likes me to lean on sometimes. It has a lot of buttons and makes clicky sounds.
Boris: *tilts head* What’s a job?
14. What is your mum’s favourite food?
Feliks: Fish.
Boris: Milk.
Feliks: You know; the food we like too.
15. What makes you proud of your mum?
Feliks: The way she cleans up and looks after us.
Boris: The amount of bad words she knows. *gigglesnort*
16. If your mum were a cartoon character, who would she be?
Boris to Feliks: What’s a cartoon??
Feliks: It’s those things that move on the big black scratching post.
Boris: Oh.
17. What do you and your mum do together?
Feliks: Read.
Boris: Sleep.
18. How are you and your mum the same?
Feliks: We both get annoyed with Boris.
Boris: We both like to sleep.
19. How are you and your mum different?
Feliks: I have a tail and she doesn’t.
Boris: I have ball..
Feliks: Not anymore you don’t genius.
20. How do you know your mum loves you?
Feliks: When she comes running when I start crying.
Boris: When she sighs and pats me.
21. Where is your mum’s favourite place to go?
Feliks & Boris: She likes it with us best.
My boys. *sigh* God luv ’em.
Posted in my boys
12 Comments
books vs film
This post was inspired by my baby brother, who is becoming obsessed with watching the series True Blood on pay tv. I admit I find it a tad disturbing considering I’m a fan of the Sookie Stackhouse series by Charlaine Harris on which the show is based.
The worst thing is that he insists on telling me about the characters and the storylines as well as the vampire gags he thinks are insanely funny like fang-bangers, Erik’s nightclub Fangtasia, etc, etc. Being a typical of male, he conveniently ignores all my “yeah, I knows”, “I KNOW I’ve got all the books” and the “for fuck’s sake would you just read the books alreadys”. Grrrrr.
Anyway it got me thinking about the adaptation of books to film – whether it be television or movie – and the hits and misses that can happen when this occurs.
Let me make clear, I’m definitely not a person who is adamantly opposed to film based on print… when it works that is. *g*
In fact, I’m a huge fan of graphic novels and comics and (some) video games which have made their way to the big screen like Max Payne (Mark Wahlberg *sigh*) and Wanted. I am THE Action Flick Chick after all.
I also tend to be one of the first in line at the cinema for adaptations of books I absolutely love. A case in point being the Twilight movie, which I was dying to see and had many conversations with my Mumma’s high school students about the trailers and the actors playing the characters. LOL. I know perhaps a little sad. 🙂
I talked about why I was disappointed with the movie here so don’t want to go into it again, but what else has or hasn’t worked for me??
Here are two that immediately spring to mind.
COLOSSAL WIN:
All others fall beneath the sheer awesomeness of the 1995 BBC production of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Jennifer Ehle as Elizabeth Bennett and Colin Firth as Mr Darcy were simply magic on screen together.
EPIC FAIL:
I adore everything about the Lord of the Rings movie trilogy. The cast, the setting, the cinematography, the cgi, the soundtrack, everything was just lush… and then came the ending of The Return of The King. WTF!
I don’t care why. I. Just. Don’t. Care. Leaving out the last section of the book where Froddo and Sam return to a home devastated by Saruman and their fight to save it was just wrong. Sorry, but it seriously was.
Deep breaths, Kris, deep breaths.
Okay, calming down now.
Well, what about you?? Is adaptation something you hate? What’s hit or missed in your world?
Posted in books, Charlaine Harris, film, further randomness, True Blood
14 Comments
how embarassment
Have you ever looked at those cluster map thingys that some blogs and websites have??
That would be me in Perth.
Could that friggin red dot get any bigger?? Bloody hell.
I am so lame. *sigh*
Posted in further randomness, I suck, me
8 Comments
tasting my keepers: ‘sparks fly’
Sparks Fly by Clare London
The Blurb:
Nic Gerrard is this year’s brightest young entrepreneur, charming and charismatic, with time for everyone. Aidan West is his cleverest programmer, fiercely committed to his work and with little time for friendship or socializing. Together they created the successful dating agency, Sparks, with a new and refreshing approach to matching people.
A year later, their lives are very different – Nic has all the trappings of success and as much company as he wants; Aidan is solitary and disapproving of such a lifestyle. When Nic decides to update the agency’s unique matching program, he and Aidan must work together again. Getting along gets harder as they deal with a malicious hacker and face a crisis at the agency. It will take both of them to make the agency work, and somehow they have to find a way to put their differences aside. Nic and Aidan have secrets to keep, and whether they’ll admit it or not, they each need something – or someone – to help Sparks fly.
Why I bought it:
This is testing my memory… I think I bought it because the story sounded different to others I’d read at the time. It, together with Caught Running, was also one of the first books I’d read from Dreamspinner Press and made me a fan of this small m/m romance epublisher.
Dislike/like (ending on a high note):
Dislike~ Neither Nic nor Aidan are particularly likeable at first, especially Aidan. The great thing about good character development… you get to learn why they are the way they are. 🙂
Like~ How often do you read a story that perfectly reflects the title?? ‘Sparks’ not only reflects the name of the matchmaking company and program, but the fireworks that happen between Nic and Aidan; intellectually, emotionally and physically. (*whispers* I would give it 3.75 bars of dynamite. *g*)
Dislike~ This will seem ridiculous with all the YA I read, but as I get older the more trouble I have with young characters in contemporary romance. Both Nic and Aidan are very young (in their early 20s), highly successful and falling deeply in love. I KNOW this happens in real life, but still… I’m sure this never bothered me that much when I read it last year… I’m turning into a grumpy old lady!
Like~ The story has a bit of a mystery plot threaded through it, which I really enjoyed. I also liked the role the secondary characters – goodies and badies – had in progressing the plot.
So, what I think:
Sparks Fly is in my keeper collection. It’s a really great story about opposites attracting.
==================================================
‘Tasting’ is my version of a mini-review where I talk a (very) little about what I liked and disliked about a book as well as who I think the story will appeal to. Oh, and I’ve added a bit about why I picked up the book in the first place – sometimes this can be interesting to know.
Posted in clare london, contemporary, m/m, tasting my keepers
8 Comments











